๐๐ผ๐๐๐น๐, ๐บ๐๐ฑ๐ฑ๐น๐ฒ๐ฑ, ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ ๐ฎฬ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ: ๐ก๐ฒ๐ ๐ฃ๐น๐๐บ๐ผ๐๐๐ต ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐
- Craig Ashworth

- Feb 4
- 2 min read
Updated: Feb 9
Ngฤmotuโs council is poised to tell the Government its resource management reforms are muddled, with unknown costs for ratepayers and risks to Mฤori interests.
New Plymouth District Council (NPDC) staff have drafted a submission on two new Government laws for Planning and for Natural Environment, which would replace the Resource Management Act (RMA).
Councillors will debate the submission at an extraordinary meeting on Wednesday.
It says the new laws include:
- unfunded mandates for councils
- risks to Mฤori interests
- concerns about costs and implementation times
- a lack of overall purpose or direction on what success means
- a lack clarity on conflict between goals
The Government says its sweeping reforms will streamline planning, make rules consistent across the country, boost economic development and land supply, and strengthen environmental protection and public health.
Under the Planning Bill and Natural Environment Bill each part of the motu would have a single Regional Spatial Plan.
In Taranaki, the Regional Spatial Plan would replace five Regional Plans and three District Plans.

Council officers advised the changes were complex and needed โcareful consideration to make sure theyโre workable, reflect our districtโs aspirations for the natural and built environment, and are consistent with Treaty obligations.โ
The draft submission says the new laws would narrow the scope of Mฤori values and rely too much on Treaty settlements, which in turn depend on rights under the soon-to-be-ditched RMA.
โWe are concerned that the narrowed recognition of Mฤori interests will impact our ability to maintain and enhance relationships with tangata whenua.โ
โOver-reliance on identified Mฤori Land significantly and disproportionately excludes the protection of ancestral land that is of significance but was alienated through confiscation or other processes."
โThe new Bills do not provide for the recognition of kaitiakitanga and broader cultural values.โ
The submission says Sites and Areas of Significance to Mฤori โ SASMs โ are key to providing for ancestral connections in New Plymouth District.
โNew Plymouth District has some of the highest concentration of Sites and Areas of Significance to Mฤori [SASMs] across the country, and very little โMฤori landโ due to the history of confiscation.โ
Wider heritage planning would also be uncertain.
โGiven the unique history of the New Plymouth District (where sites were formed by Mฤori and later used by European settlers during the NZ Wars) NPDC seeks clear guidance on managing sites with multiple heritage values, or the ability to use bespoke provisionsโ
The submission says duplication in the system, with some heritage managed by central government, would be inefficient.
๐๐ฟ๐ ๐๐จ ๐ก๐ค๐๐๐ก ๐๐ค๐๐ฎ ๐๐ค๐ช๐ง๐ฃ๐๐ก๐๐จ๐ข ๐๐ค๐จ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ ๐๐ ๐๐ค๐ง๐๐ข๐๐ ๐ค ๐ค ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ช๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐๐ฎ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ค ๐๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ค ๐ผ๐ค๐ฉ๐๐๐ง๐ค๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ง๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ ๐๐ค๐ฉ๐ช




Comments